Deferred success

posted at 11.17pm

Teachers have today proposed* banning the word ‘fail’ in schools, instead telling kids that got the answer wrong that they just ‘deferred success’. I’m sorry, but have you ever heard such laughable tripe in your whole God damn life?

Deferred success? Is that not just as ‘harmful’ to kids’ minds? If that’s the case, they can just sit back, keep on deferring all the success they’re bound to get, and wait for it all to fall into their poor little laps. Being told I got a question wrong when I was younger just made me want it even more. I wanted to impress people. I wanted to get a good grade. If everyone’s a success at everything that they possibly can be, just because it hurts a bit to tell them they failed, how is anyone going to achieve anything?

Have the high and mighty forgotten that some people aren’t educationally brilliant? Perhaps they’re an inspiring musician or budding bricklayer. Perhaps they WANT to be a bricklayer. Have they thought of that?

Exams are bad enough. You can take them again, and again, and again, until every delinquent little beast in the country has 20 A*s to their name. And only half as many university places available. Top idea.

One step too far.

*I apologise for dirtying the blog already with a link to the Sun, but it was the only one I could find.

Linking Blogs Add to del.icio.us

2 Comments »

The URI to TrackBack this entry is: http://infinityplus.blogsome.com/2005/07/20/deferred-success-2/trackback/

  1. It makes the education system look better. If they lower the standard it takes to pass exams, they will get more people passing and look more successful. Simple manipulation.

    Comment by Mark — July 20, 2005 @ 11.24pm

  2. testcomment997

    Comment by testanchor624 — October 16, 2005 @ 12.50am

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Leave a comment

Line and paragraph breaks automatic, e-mail address never displayed, HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>